The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

August 12, 2021 COVID Health Conditions Views

Attorney Tells RFK Jr: California’s State of Emergency Can’t Be Indefinite, That’s Why We’re Suing Gov. Newsom

Attorney Scott Street and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discuss a lawsuit filed in the California Supreme Court by Children’s Health Defense asking for an immediate end to Gov. Newsom’s state of emergency.

CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. spoke with Attorney Scott Street and CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Scott Street, attorney for the Orange County Board of Education, told Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chairman Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast” that California’s state of emergency, issued by Gov. Gavin Newsom in March 2020, is being used to alter the way the government functions in California.

Orange County Board of Education and CHD on Tuesday filed a petition for writ of mandate in the California Supreme Court — the highest court in California — asking the court to declare an immediate end to the governor’s declared state of emergency.

“The biggest problem we’ve seen in California,” said Street, “is the state of emergency has been used to disrupt and change the way government functions here in California.”

The lawsuit argues that a state of emergency lasting “18 months is enough,” said Street. “A state of emergency, by definition, cannot be indefinite.”

Street said:

“The government is supposed to work through a normal process. The legislature makes a law. The executive branch executes and administers the law. In some cases, administrative agencies like the state department of public health can issue orders, rules and regulations, but they’re supposed to follow a normal process, transparent in the open with an opportunity for public debates.

“That hasn’t been happening because the governor has said during the emergency we shouldn’t have to do that. So those are the fundamental issues of governance that are at stake, and that we’re asking the supreme court to restore to the people of the state of California.”

Kennedy said “when you delegate your rulemaking power to a regulatory agency,” the U.S. Constitution says that agency cannot enforce the regulation without taking steps to ensure citizens are part of the regulatory process.

This process prevents it from becoming a “dictator situation” where laws and regulations are passed that are “arbitrary and capricious,” said Kennedy. “You need due process.”

Kennedy said:

“I think we have a really good chance of winning this case and forcing a change to these emergency declarations, not only in California, but hopefully across the country.”

Listen here:

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form