The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

March 8, 2023 Big Tech Legal News

Legal

CHD, California Groups Sue Los Angeles County to Stop Fast-Track Proliferation of Wireless Towers

Children’s Health Defense and a coalition of community and environmental groups advocating for safe technology on Monday sued Los Angeles County to overturn amendments adopted by the county that allow for the fast-tracked proliferation of wireless infrastructure without due process and without residents’ right to appeal.

chd lawsuit los angeles wireless towers feature

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and a coalition of community and environmental groups advocating for safe technology on Monday sued Los Angeles County to overturn amendments adopted by the county in January that allow for the fast-tracked proliferation of wireless infrastructure without due process and without residents’ right to appeal.

The lawsuit, filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleges the amendments to title 16 and title 22 of the Los Angeles County Code violate the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by exempting projects under the ordinances from CEQA review.

The lawsuit also contends the ordinances raise constitutional due process concerns in relation to wireless projects that directly affect local residents, who will suffer significant losses of personal and real property rights without the ability to contest.

“The ordinance is purposefully designed to create a back-room, tower permit rubber-stamp process that excludes the public and even nearby residents that will be directly affected and aggrieved,” said W. Scott McCollough, attorney for the plaintiffs.

“The ordinance does — and individual permit decisions will — entirely ignore the environmental and other effects on people. It will exacerbate, not solve, the digital divide.”

The plaintiffs petitioned the court for a temporary stay and restraining order and preliminary injunction, pending resolution of the lawsuit.

The complaint points to multiple examples of what plaintiffs claim violate CEQA, the California Constitution and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors’ own rule.

According to the complaint:

“The Ordinance creates the framework for permitting thousands of wireless facilities throughout … the County. The Board of Supervisors purposefully and unlawfully blinded themselves to the significant and adverse consequences to its local communities and the environment that will occur as a direct result of this Project.

“A wireless project can often so sicken local residents that it constructively evicts whole families who can no longer tolerate continuous exposure to non-ionizing radiation emitted from small cell and macro cell towers. This situation is especially tragic for poor and minority families who are holding on desperately to affordable housing and lack any financial means of escape.

“Basic justice demands that these families … be given adequate prior notice and a fair hearing before their voices are silenced, their property is taken or devalued, or their lives are put at risk.”

The complaint alleges wireless facilities “will endanger the air, water, flora, fauna and objects of historic or aesthetic significance,” and that the facilities are “not designed to withstand earthquakes or floods and will create new risks of fire.”

The coalition bringing the lawsuit includes Fiber First LA, Mothers of East LA, Boyle Heights Community Partners, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians and Union Binacional de Organizaciones de Trabajadores Mexicanos Ex Braceros 1942-1964.

“The right of citizens to have a voice in important decisions about their health, their safety and their future is fundamental to American democracy,” said Brenda Martinez, founding member of Fiber First LA.

“The L.A. Board of Supervisors has clearly put the interests of giant telecoms ahead of the interests of the people they’re supposed to represent. There’s no other reason to take away the right of people in our community to be heard.”

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form