Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
The number one job of Big Ag — just like almost every other corporation — is to make money for shareholders and/or senior company executives. It’s all about the Benjamins.
Big Ag all too often either breaks laws or acts unethically to shake the money tree. And for Big Ag executives that’s often just dandy.
Money trumps everything — be it concern for worker safety, transparent oversight of product production, fair consumer product prices based on market supply and demand factors or paying farmers fairly for their work.
And Big Ag exploits cozy relationships with Congress, federal regulators including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as well as state lawmakers and agencies to maximize profit.
At the moment the scandal du jour is the multi-year effort of Big Poultry to scam chicken broiler wholesalers by illegally rigging bids and fixing chicken prices.
Already Pilgrim’s Pride has paid fines totaling $182.9 million. Tyson paid a $221.5 million fine and entered the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust criminal leniency program. That’s just the tip of the iceberg.
The DOJ has issued indictments to six chicken executives accused of fixing prices. Expect more indictments forthcoming.
It feels like this splashy high-profile case has pushed other Big Ag wrongdoings off the front pages. But the ongoing dicamba debacle may soon recapture public attention.
The problem is that dicamba spray easily drifts off target, killing or damaging whatever vegetation it lands on. But Monsanto, with EPA enablers, tried to pretend they had the answers.
But real-world usage has painted a different story. Hard numbers are difficult to come by but no one is denying millions and millions of soybean acres have been damaged by dicamba drift since 2017.
Still, Bayer and the EPA pressed on. Despite mounting evidence that dicamba wasn’t working, the EPA last October re-registered dicamba for five additional years.
It has been revealed that registration was based on Trump White House political consideration more than sound science.
For the 2021 growing season, the EPA issued a new application label requiring farmers to add an approved pH-buffering agent to reduce drift. Then the agency crossed its fingers and hoped for the best.
Well … now we know that didn’t work out so well. In Illinois. In Arkansas. I expect other state agencies to make similar claims. It’s gotten so bad that Stine Seed’s founder took a shot at Bayer’s dicamba this summer:
“I kept thinking that somewhere, somehow this dicamba nightmare would get straightened out. When they put out all these false stories that the damage was due to environmental concerns, the damage was due to bad genes and some of our genetics, that’s what pushed me over the edge.”
The good news is that the EPA is seeking an accounting of dicamba drift during the 2021 growing season. The agency sent letters to all Big Ag companies registered to produce dicamba: BASF, Bayer, Corteva and Syngenta.
The EPA wants to know any and all information recorded on adverse effects of dicamba including but not limited to expert reports, internal company correspondence, deposition transcripts, responses to interrogatories, and any legal documents generated regarding lawsuits or potential lawsuits on dicamba drift.
In short, the EPA wants everything. If the EPA looks honestly at how dicamba performed in 2021 the agency should reach the conclusion that its latest label — just like the four previous from 2017 to 2020 — is a bust.
Reasonable minds can make the case that Monsanto’s dicamba should have never been registered in the first place. But it was and now billions of dollars are at stake based on what the EPA does with the huge treasure trove of information it has demanded.
Dicamba has been a huge failure. And given the track record, it’s unlikely anything the EPA will come up with will change that trajectory in 2022.
Will the EPA have the integrity to admit dicamba needs to go back to the drawing board or will it continue to cozy up to Big Ag?
Originally published on Investigate Midwest.