Do you want the government telling Facebook, TikTok or Instagram to censor you, your neighbors or your issues?
Do you want the government to coerce the media and tech giants to do its bidding to stop free speech?
WHY THIS CASE? WHY NOW?
The States of Missouri and Louisiana and the individual plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v. Biden) – as do plaintiffs in Kennedy/CHD v. Biden – allege that the Biden Administration impermissibly coerced and pressured social media companies to deplatform and shadowban users and censor truthful content regarding COVID, regulatory failures, vaccines, and other content with which the Biden administration disagrees. The District Court (W.D.La.) ruled that the Biden Administration had to stop many of its actions, even while the case was still being heard, but that ruling is stayed until the Supreme Court reaches its decision.
SCOTUS’s ruling in this case will have far-reaching implications for the free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment that Americans have enjoyed since the Founding Fathers. Justices heard oral arguments while freedom-loving advocates for free speech and no censorship gathered outside to exercise our free speech rights.
Who
Speakers:
- Mary Holland, Esq., Children’s Health Defense
- Pierre Kory, M.D., FLCCC Alliance
- Paul Marik, M.D., FLCCC Alliance
- Del Bigtree, ICAN
- Aaron Kheriaty, M.D., plaintiff in Missouri v. Biden
- Jeffrey A. Tucker, Brownstone Institute
- Jim Hoft, The Gateway Pundit
- Daniel O’Connor, TrialSiteNews
- L. Todd Wood, Creative Destruction Media
- Amy Bohn, PERK
- Christina Parks, Ph.D.
- Mary Talley Bowden, M.D.
- Tricia Lindsay, Esq.
- Sujata Gibson, Esq.
- Mikki Willis, filmmaker – “Plandemic Series”
Where
Supreme Court of the United States,
1 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20543
When
March 18, 2024 @ 9 a.m. ET
