The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

July 13, 2026 Big Pharma Censorship/Surveillance News

Toxic Exposures

500 Tylenol-Autism Lawsuits Get New Life After Ruling by Federal Appeals Court

A federal appeals court today said a lower court must allow three expert witnesses to testify in a multidistrict litigation alleging Tylenol maker Kenvue concealed risks linked to prenatal acetaminophen exposure. The decision revives more than 500 lawsuits that had been dismissed after a lower court “overstepped its gatekeeping function” by excluding the expert testimony, according to the ruling.

tylenol bottle and pills and pregnant woman

A federal appeals court today revived more than 500 lawsuits alleging that Tylenol maker Kenvue failed to warn consumers that taking the pain reliever during pregnancy could increase the risk of autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, Reuters reported.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York found that a lower court improperly excluded testimony from three expert witnesses offered by parents and guardians pursuing the claims.

In a 64-page decision, Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel that the experts’ methodologies reflected approaches used by other scientists and “constitute acceptable interpretations of scientific evidence where scientists may, and in fact do, disagree.”

Calabresi stressed that the appeals court was not deciding whether acetaminophen causes autism or ADHD, or whether elected officials should take additional steps to protect public health. Instead, the ruling found that the testimony should be heard as the litigation moves forward.

Attorney Ray Flores, who has represented families in vaccine and pharmaceutical litigation but is not involved in the Tylenol multidistrict litigation, said the appeals court concluded the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York had exceeded its role in evaluating expert evidence.

“The 2nd Circuit ruled that the District Court ‘overstepped its gatekeeping function’ to ‘shield the jury’ from ‘junk science’ by excluding expert testimony,” Flores told The Defender. “The appellate court ruled that these doctors could offer acceptable interpretations of evidence linking Tylenol to autism and ADHD when taken during pregnancy.”

The experts whose testimony was reinstated are Andrea Baccarelli, M.D., Ph.D., faculty dean of Harvard University’s School of Public Health; Dr. Eric Hollander, a psychiatry professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine; and Brandon Pearson, Ph.D., a toxicologist at Columbia University, Reuters reported.

“We are pleased that the panel unanimously found that our key experts reliably applied their scientific methods and principles,” Ashley Keller, an attorney representing the parents, said in an email to Reuters.

The court upheld the exclusion of two other experts, and declined to express “any opinion about the correctness” of a third.

The ruling sends the lawsuits back to U.S. District Judge Denise Cote for further proceedings.

In 2024, judge excluded experts’ testimony as unreliable

The lawsuits allege that Kenvue concealed risks associated with prenatal exposure to acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol.

Doctors and major medical organizations have long considered acetaminophen the preferred pain reliever during pregnancy, and Kenvue has consistently maintained that the product is safe.

In a statement quoted by the Financial Times, Kenvue said Monday’s ruling “does not change the fact that credible, independent science shows no proven link between taking acetaminophen and autism or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.”

Kenvue was spun off from Johnson & Johnson in 2023, after the company had manufactured Tylenol for more than 60 years.

Monday’s decision reverses a December 2024 ruling by Cote, who dismissed the consolidated lawsuits after excluding testimony from the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. Cote concluded that the experts’ methodologies were unreliable, leaving plaintiffs without admissible expert testimony to support their claims.

In November 2025, Kleenex and Huggies maker Kimberly-Clark announced plans to acquire Kenvue in a deal valued at more than $40 billion, The Guardian reported. In January 2026, shareholders overwhelmingly approved the acquisition.

The Financial Times reported that Kenvue shares fell about 1% after Monday’s decision. The company’s stock remains down 12% from a year earlier amid ongoing litigation and political scrutiny surrounding Tylenol.

Trump, Kennedy announcements intensified scrutiny

The case drew heightened national attention in September 2025 when President Donald Trump and U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that federal health agencies would undertake extensive research into all possible causes of autism, including vaccines.

At the same White House event, officials also announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would add warnings to Tylenol and other acetaminophen-containing products advising pregnant women of a possible link between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and autism.

Officials also said they would advise physicians and the public about the potential risks.

During the announcement, Kennedy said federal officials intended to revisit questions that had not received adequate scientific scrutiny.

“One area that we are closely examining … is vaccines,” Kennedy said. “We will perform the studies that should have been performed 25 years ago. Whatever the answer is, we will tell you what we find.”

Trump pointed to rising autism diagnoses and called for further investigation into potential causes, including the childhood vaccination schedule.

In 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that an estimated 1 in 31 (3.22%) 8-year-old children had an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis in 2022, up from 1 in 36 (2.8%) in 2020 and 1 in 1,000 children in the 1990s.

The White House announcement prompted criticism from legacy media, Kenvue, TikTok influencers and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which maintained that acetaminophen remains safe for use during pregnancy.

Media coverage included a Reuters article, “Tylenol is safe, doctors tell worried pregnant moms” and a BBC report stating that “US doctors face anxious Tylenol conversations after Trump’s autism announcement.”

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

Research and lawsuits continue to fuel debate

The renewed federal scrutiny followed years of scientific debate over acetaminophen use during pregnancy.

Over the past decade, multiple epidemiological and observational studies have reported associations between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and ADHD.

Among them, a 2019 study published in JAMA Psychiatry found that children whose mothers had higher concentrations of acetaminophen metabolites in umbilical cord blood had increased odds of later being diagnosed with autism or ADHD.

In 2021, 91 scientists published a consensus statement in Nature Reviews Endocrinology concluding that accumulating evidence warranted “precautionary action” regarding acetaminophen use during pregnancy.

Flores said the scientific evidence is even stronger for acetaminophen exposure after birth.

“Without the protection from the mother’s liver during gestation, the evidence is much stronger that Tylenol causes these disorders in neonates, infants and children under 6 due to their inability to process acetaminophen,” he said.

The legal battle expanded in October 2025, when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Johnson & Johnson and Kenvue, alleging the companies deceptively marketed Tylenol as safe for pregnant women despite evidence linking prenatal acetaminophen exposure to autism and ADHD.

In February 2026, a Texas judge rejected Kenvue’s bid to dismiss the lawsuit, according to Reuters.

Flores said Monday’s ruling is unlikely to resolve the litigation anytime soon.

“Since there are over 500 separate cases and numerous major retailers are named defendants, this will still be interesting, albeit time-consuming, multidistrict litigation,” he said.

Related articles in The Defender

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form