The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

April 29, 2022 Big Chemical Views

Big Chemical

Legal Victory Holds 3M Accountable for Polluting Tennesse River, Attorney Tells RFK Jr.

“Our goal in the lawsuit was to try to bring about a day when you could eat the fish,” lawyer Bill Matsikoudis told Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an interview on “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.”

The Tennessee River is like “a sick patient,” according to lawyer Bill Matsikoudis, but it’s on its way to recovery.

Matsikoudis, founder of the New Jersey law firm Matsikoudis & Fanciullo, in October 2021 helped to achieve a historic legal victory: holding 3M accountable for polluting the Tennesee River.

In a settlement, 3M was ordered to pay $98.4 million to remediate contamination from its chemical plant along the Tennessee River in north Alabama.

Matsikoudis discussed the case with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.”

Kennedy also has prevailed in legal cases against Big Chemical. He was part of the team that took on DuPont in a landmark case that exposed the harm caused by perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a highly toxic man-made chemical used to make Teflon.

After 12 years of litigation, the case settled for $633 million. It became known as the “Dark Waters case” after the 2019 movie starring actor Mark Ruffalo.

Kennedy said:

“The most important thing we got out of that case was a mandate for the company to do medical monitoring, and to do a real study on the medical implications of having PFOAs in your blood.

“Almost all Americans now have some level of PFOAS in their blood, and once it gets in you, it is there forever.”

The science in Matsikoudis’ case against 3M was based on the medical monitoring data that came out of the Dark Waters case.

Kennedy and Matsikoudis agreed 3M was willfully negligent.

3M was “sitting on the Tennessee River for decades and decades, creating these chemicals that have now rendered the fish uneatable, Matsikoudis said. “So … our goal in the lawsuit was to try to bring about a day when you could eat the fish.”

Kennedy said:

“They didn’t care that they were … poisoning the Tennesee River. They just didn’t care because they could make money by doing it. … My attitude is — clean it up, clean it all up, clean up the last molecule, because you had no permission.

“What you did was illegal. We do not want it in our fish. We own the river. You don’t.”

Watch the full podcast here:
Suggest A Correction

Share Options

Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form