The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

April 27, 2022 Big Chemical Views

Big Chemical

EPA’s Shrinking Staff Can’t Keep Pace With New Pesticide Applications

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is required to approve new pesticides chemical companies want to bring to market, but since 2005, the number of new pesticide applications has more than doubled, while the number of employees overseeing the process has dropped by a quarter.

One important job that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has is approving new pesticides that chemical companies want to bring to market, as well as ensuring that older pesticides still meet today’s safety standards.

The EPA has more work to do these days, but it has fewer employees to do it, agency data released on April 11 shows.

Since 2005, the number of completed pesticide registrations has more than doubled, while the number of employees overseeing the process has dropped by a quarter.

In 2004, Congress passed a law aimed at speeding the process of registering these pesticides. The Pesticide Registration Improvement Act requires pesticide manufacturers to pay fees to help fund the review process.

Registrants pay for the number of products registered, so the agency receives more money for more products.

But this money has not allowed the pesticide staff to keep pace with the number of new products.

The EPA highlighted this discrepancy in a work plan released on April 11 designed to address its backlog of finding whether new pesticides violate the Endangered Species Act.

Currently, the agency has a nearly two-decade-long backlog of Endangered Species Act decisions. The EPA said this was “an unsustainable and legally tenuous situation.”

In the graph below, “FTEs” means the number of positions available to review old and new registrations for pesticides.

Originally published by Investigate Midwest.

Suggest A Correction

Share Options

Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form