The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.
After losing two rounds in lower federal courts, a group of Indiana University students challenging the school’s coronavirus vaccine were dealt a final blow Thursday as the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the college’s vaccination requirement.
In the first coronavirus vaccine mandate challenge of its kind before the nation’s highest court, the eight Indiana University (I.U.) students requested an emergency order, arguing that they are adults who are “entitled to make their own medical treatment decisions, and have a constitutional right to bodily integrity, autonomy, and of medical treatment choice in the context of a vaccination mandate.”
“I.U., however, is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions,” they said, accusing university officials of substituting themselves “for both the student and her attending physician, mandating a choice which is the student’s to make, based on her physician’s advice.”
Justice Amy Coney Barrett — who handles emergency appeals from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit — chose not to bring the matter before the full Supreme Court. She provided no explanation for her decision.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court refuses grant Indiana University students’ request to block the school’s vaccine mandate. Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected the request without referring it to the full court. https://t.co/j6ftPBimz4
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) August 12, 2021
The panel cited Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a 1905 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states can require all members of the public to be vaccinated against smallpox — a disease with a 30% mortality rate that killed millions of people each year until it was eradicated in the late 20th century following a worldwide vaccination campaign.
Given Jacobson, the 7th Circuit ruled, “there can’t be a constitutional problem with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2,” the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.
Furthermore, the court said that “this case is easier than Jacobson,” because unlike Massachusetts’ universal vaccine mandate at issue in that case, I.U. offers students medical and religious exemptions from vaccination.
The 7th Circuit judges also noted that students “who do not want to be vaccinated may go elsewhere” for schooling.
“Many universities require vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, but many others do not,” they said. “Plaintiffs have ample educational opportunities.”
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, over 700 of the more than 5,000 accredited U.S. institutions of higher learning currently require students to be inoculated against the coronavirus.
Thursday’s Supreme Court move comes a day after California became the first state to require all school staff members to prove they are vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit to weekly COVID-19 testing, an approach endorsed by U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Originally published by Common Dreams.