The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

October 26, 2023 Big Energy Views

Big Energy

Forest Service to Allow Industry to Dump Dangerous Carbon Waste on Public Lands

The U.S. Forest Service proposes “to allow exclusive or perpetual right of use or occupancy … of National Forest System (NFS) lands” for carbon waste injection and storage. Carbon waste, in addition to requiring pipelines and injection wells, can cause people and animals to suffocate or even die.

forest service carbon pipeline waste feature

By Jim Furnish

In my 34-year career at the U.S. Forest Service, the agency worked to support American industry while also maintaining public lands and the renewable resources they foster.

That’s why I am shocked to learn that the agency plans to make a fundamental change to how it manages our public lands: allowing private parties to permanently dump industrial pollution in national forests.

While I was serving as Siuslaw National Forest Supervisor in Oregon, and deputy chief for all U.S. national forests, the agency updated its special use permit rules in 1998.

At that time, the agency was adamant that no industry — no matter how useful to society — had the right to permanently use or occupy national forest lands.

The agency was clear that it opposed “an exclusive and perpetual use of Federal land.”

To do otherwise would undermine longstanding policies meant to protect national forest ecosystems and recreational uses.

Now, in an alarming contradiction, the Forest Service proposes to blow a pipeline-sized hole in its regulations, quoting here “to allow exclusive or perpetual right of use or occupancy … of National Forest System (NFS) lands” for carbon waste injection and storage.

This carbon waste, in addition to requiring pipelines and injection wells, can cause people and animals to suffocate or even die.

This I know: Once gases are piped underground, there are no do-overs. What’s done is done. And I wouldn’t want to be a Forest Service ranger working anywhere near these dangerous operations.

Why the abrupt change? Nothing in laws establishing our national forests has changed since the rule was updated in the 1990s, but the Forest Service now seems to think that it can throw away decades of policy preventing “forever” permits that privatize forests for corporate use.

Maybe the answer comes — as it often does — from following the money. The carbon would likely come from smokestacks of facilities like coal-fired power plants.

Fossil fuel companies are eager to adopt carbon capture and storage as a way to perpetuate business as usual in the face of our need to transition to renewable energy.

After capturing their pollution, these industries have to put it somewhere.

Sending the waste through pipelines to national forests is surely more appealing than dealing with landowner opposition to carbon pipeline companies’ efforts to take private property by eminent domain.

To add icing to the cake: the federal government is offering companies massive tax subsidies to dispose of their carbon waste, even though research has shown this program is wrought with fraud.

Some national forests will be targeted sooner based on their geology, but this rule change puts all of them at risk of future applicants’ desire to make quick profits and spoil public lands permanently.

Impacts of this rule change could spread across our landscape: National forests are widely distributed throughout America, and highly valued for recreation, domestic water sources, crucial fish and wildlife habitat and outstanding scenery.

Ultimately, policy questions turn on values. Forests store tremendous amounts of carbon — naturally!

The agency has a golden opportunity to elevate the value of carbon sequestration by protecting mature and old-growth forests.

Isn’t this a better values choice than chasing tired polluting industry practices that are squarely opposite where our climate change battle should be heading?

The Forest Service should abandon its proposal to permanently privatize the public’s land and endanger our shared renewable resources and ecosystems, which only benefits a small group of rich companies and investors.

National forests have a huge role to play in protecting biodiversity and storing carbon in forested landscapes.

Allowing polluters to permanently industrialize these lands will only rob the public of real climate solutions in order to chase after fraught, false ones.

Originally published by Common Dreams

Jim Furnish retired from the U.S. Forest Service after serving for 34 years, including as deputy chief for national forests from 1999 to 2002.

Suggest A Correction

Share Options

Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form