The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

October 23, 2026 › Censorship/Surveillance › Health Conditions › News

Censorship/Surveillance

Florida’s Plan to End Four School Vaccine Mandates Hits Legal Snag

A Florida physicians group has filed a legal challenge to the state’s plan to eliminate four childhood vaccine requirements, arguing that health officials exceeded their authority and failed to follow state rulemaking procedures. Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo defended parental rights, arguing that families — not the government — should decide which vaccines their children receive.

child at school

The Florida Department of Health’s effort to eliminate school and daycare vaccine mandates has hit a legal roadblock after the Florida Academy of Family Physicians (FAFP) filed a petition challenging the proposed changes.

The recently filed petition argues that the department’s proposal exceeded its statutory authority, failed to provide new medical evidence questioning the vaccines’ safety and violated procedural deadlines for adopting the rule.

The proposal, backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, aims to change vaccine requirements — including hepatitis B, chickenpox, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and pneumococcal disease — for schoolchildren.

Ladapo has defended it as a matter of parental rights, arguing that families — not the government — should decide which vaccines their children receive.

“We are not insensitive to the fact that people do have illness, and that’s a challenge,” Ladapo said earlier this month. “That cannot supersede the right of a parent to make a decision about what’s best for their child.”

In a statement to The Defender, the FAFP said:

“For families with infants, children undergoing cancer treatment, people with compromised immune systems and others at greater risk, removal of these protections can have very real consequences. Those impacts deserve careful consideration before longstanding requirements are removed.”

The proposal would revise Florida Administrative Code Rule 64D-3.046, which governs immunization requirements for children entering schools and childcare facilities.

The changes were expected to take effect this year, but the legal challenge has complicated that schedule.

“The timeline will be contingent on legal outcomes,” Florida Department of Health spokesperson Isabel White said.

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

What comes next

The petition — filed on behalf of the FAFP, its president, Dr. Danielle Carter and three individuals identified only by their initials — will now face judicial review.

The physicians group also alleges that the department violated Florida’s rulemaking requirements by taking 225 days to publish the final rule after initially proposing the changes in December. State law requires the process to be completed within 180 days, the group said.

The outcome of the case could determine whether Florida can proceed with eliminating the four mandates or must reconsider its approach.

The proposal would not eliminate all school vaccine mandates. Requirements for other diseases — measles-mumps-rubella, polio, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus — would remain in place.

Parents could still voluntarily obtain the four vaccines no longer required for enrollment.

The legal challenge comes after Florida officials abandoned a separate proposal to expand vaccine exemptions to include moral or ethical objections. The department removed that language from its revised proposal in September.

Related articles in The Defender

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.