The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

February 9, 2026 Big Food Toxic Exposures News

Policy

FDA Rewrites Food Labeling Rules for ‘No Artificial Colors’

The FDA will now allow companies to claim their products contain “no artificial colors” as long as the added dyes are naturally derived and not petroleum-based. U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called the move “real progress” away from synthetic colors. But critics warned the policy lacks accountability and could mislead consumers.

beets and words "no artificial colors"

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last week made it easier for food manufacturers to claim their products contain “no artificial colors” — even when the products contain added dyes.

Previously, companies could use that label only if a product contained no added dyes. Under the new FDA guidance, manufacturers can claim “no artificial colors” as long as the added dyes are naturally derived and not petroleum-based.

“This is real progress,” said U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “We are making it easier for companies to move away from petroleum-based synthetic colors and adopt safer, naturally derived alternatives. This momentum advances our broader effort to help Americans eat real food and Make America Healthy Again.”

However, critics said the change falls short because it relies on industry compliance rather than enforceable rules.

Ken Cook, president and co-founder of the Environmental Working Group, called the move “another broken promise.”

The FDA “pledged outright bans on dangerous food chemical additives,” Cook said in a statement. “Instead Kennedy settles for handshake deals with Big Food and chemical companies — agreements with no real accountability and no guarantee they’ll be honored.”

Natural dyes not necessarily ‘inherently safer’

Last week, the FDA also approved beetroot red, a reddish-purple pigment from beets, and expanded the use of spirulina extract, a blue-green pigment from algae.

The FDA approved four other natural color additives in 2025:

  • Galdieria extract blue, from red algae.
  • Butterfly pea flower extract, from butterfly pea flowers.
  • Calcium phosphate, a mineral-based white color.
  • Gardenia (genipin) blue, from gardenia fruit.

These six natural dyes can be used to color a variety of foods, including candy, gum, frosting, ice cream, chips, cereals, smoothies and beverages.

Under the FDA’s previous rules, foods using these naturally derived dyes still fell under the “artificial” umbrella.

“We acknowledge that calling colors derived from natural sources ‘artificial’ might be confusing for consumers and a hindrance for companies to explore alternative food coloring options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary. “We’re taking away that hindrance and making it easier for companies to use these colors in the foods our families eat every day.”

But the change may create a new kind of confusion, as foods labeled “no artificial colors” can now contain added colorants.

The updated guidelines don’t guarantee that all additives are safe or chemical-free. The FDA uses batch certification to test additives and ensure they meet purity standards. However, some food chemicals, including natural dyes, are exempt from the process.

In a letter outlining its updated policy, the FDA reminded manufacturers using exempt color additives that they must “take all possible measures to ensure the safety” of their dyes.

The agency also urged companies to limit impurities, including heavy metals, solvent residues and microbial contaminants.

“Natural dyes do not necessarily mean ‘inherently safer,’” Madeline Peck, a registered dietitian and nutrition editor for EatingWell. “Sometimes, products will use more of a natural dye to color than they would a synthetic dye, since the natural dyes degrade faster, resulting in a more dull color.”

Online tracking site shows progress in ridding foods of petroleum-based dyes

Kennedy made changing the American diet a central focus when he took office last year.

In April 2025, he asked food companies to voluntarily remove six artificial food dyes by the end of 2026. These include Green No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5, Yellow No. 6, Blue No. 1 and Blue No. 2.

Kennedy also urged the industry to accelerate the removal of Red No. 3, which the FDA banned in January 2025.

Studies link the dyes to cancer, hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral issues, especially in children.

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

In Europe, foods containing these dyes must carry warning labels stating the dyes “may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children,” according to Food Dive.

In March 2025, Kennedy called on top executives from major food companies, including General Mills Inc. and The Kraft Heinz Co., to remove artificial dyes before the end of his term. He has since commended the companies for working with him on the issue.

An FDA public tracking site shows that many large food companies — including Campbell’s, Conagra Brands Inc., General Mills, Kraft Heinz and Walmart Inc. — are phasing out petroleum-based dyes.

In-N-Out Burger, PepsiCo Inc., Sam’s Club and Tyson Foods Inc. report that they have completed the transition.

PepsiCo listed Cheetos and Doritos as the only products affected by the pledge to remove petroleum-based food dyes. According to the FDA’s chart, updated products are “made with no artificial flavors or dyes, and completely colorless.”

Related articles in The Defender

Suggest A Correction

Share Options

Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form