The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

August 24, 2026 Big Food Health Conditions News

Toxic Exposures

Big Food Routinely Sues Governments to Overturn Public Health Policies

Food companies, including Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Mars, have sued governments 239 times between 2010 and 2025, according to Lighthouse Reports’ investigation. The analysis examined lawsuits in six countries, including the U.S., Britain and India. Most of the lawsuits focused on food products’ labels, which detail the ingredients and nutritional value.

pesticide application lawn sign and young girl on swing at playground

By Sky Chadde

Companies such as Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Mars have regularly sued governments around the world in an effort to prevent public health proposals from being implemented, according to new reporting by Lighthouse Reports and a slew of media partners.

Diets full of ultraprocessed foods — such as fast food, cereals, soft drinks and protein bars — have been linked to poor health outcomes. Governments around the globe have responded by adding warning labels on packages and placing restrictions on marketing.

To fight back, food companies have sued 239 times between 2010 and 2025, according to Lighthouse Reports’ investigation. The analysis examined lawsuits in six countries, including the U.S., Britain and India.

Most of the lawsuits focused on food products’ labels, which detail the ingredients and nutritional value.

There wouldn’t be a slew of lawsuits if labeling wasn’t effective, a public health expert at New York University told The Guardian.

“The lawsuits tell us that public health measures reduce sales of unhealthful products,” she said.

The vast majority of lawsuits were filed in Mexico, where many of the country’s children and adolescents are considered overweight.

After the country instituted a labeling requirement for soft drinks, a local company that bottled Pepsi sued, saying the labels “demonized” the product, according to Lighthouse Reports. Judges rejected the legal argument.

The new reporting also highlights an example in the U.S.

A small city in California instituted a tax on soft drinks. Then, a group bankrolled by Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and the maker of Dr. Pepper started recruiting young Black and Latino political candidates who campaigned against the tax, arguing it discriminated against poor people, according to Santa Cruz Local.

Originally published by Investigate Midwest

Sky Chadde has covered the agriculture industry for Investigate Midwest since 2019 and spent much of 2020 focused on the COVID-19 crisis in meatpacking plants, which included collecting and analyzing data on case counts. He also served as the newsroom’s first managing editor and is now a full-time reporter.

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form