The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

July 2, 2026 Toxic Exposures

Big Chemical NewsWatch

Echoes of the Past in Pennsylvania Coal Towns’ Fight Against Data Centers + More

The Defender’s Big Chemical NewsWatch delivers the latest headlines, from a variety of news sources, related to toxic chemicals and their effect on human health and the environment. The views expressed in the below excerpts from other news sources do not necessarily reflect the views of The Defender.

Echoes of the Past in Pennsylvania Coal Towns’ Fight Against Data Centers

Inside Climate News reported:

The Hazle Township Supervisors faced a packed room. Hanging on the wall behind them, black lettering spelled out “We the People.” In front of them sat and stood about a hundred community members, some wearing yellow T-shirts that read “Project Hazelnot,” with a red circle and backslash for the “o.”

Their shirts were a message to the developers of Project Hazelnut, who want to build a massive data center complex on the township’s coal-rich plateau. The proposal includes plans for 15 data center buildings and an electrical substation across a nearly 1,300-acre site.

The project came up against what may be its final barrier that night on June 8 when the board voted on a zoning ordinance that would put a pause on data center applications in the town for 180 days. During this time, the board plans to update its zoning rules and add specific restrictions for data centers.

EPA Ditches Biden-Era Assessment on PFAS in Sludge

E&E News reported:

The Trump administration is ditching a Biden-era assessment on “forever chemicals” in sewage sludge fertilizer that was seen as a steppingstone toward federal regulation.

In its place, EPA on Wednesday released voluntary recommendations for sewage plant operators, states and the public to manage and reduce levels of the toxic chemicals in sludge.

“This draft guidance will provide Americans with commonsense recommendations that can protect public health, while also supporting wastewater systems and beneficial use of biosolids when appropriate,” Jess Kramer, EPA assistant administrator for water, said in a news release.

NC Budget Sets $22M Aside for New PFAS Study, but Moves to Keep Its Results Confidential

NC Newsline reported:

North Carolina lawmakers are proposing another study of “forever chemicals” in the new state budget. However, the project would sidestep a state regulatory agency in favor of an agency under legislative control, and critics say it’s a stalling tactic.

Released Tuesday, the budget allocates a total of $22 million to the North Carolina Collaboratory at UNC-Chapel Hill​​ for research related to PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances known as “forever chemicals.” They don’t break down easily and have been linked to health risks like cancer.

The budget would also classify the staff of the Collaboratory as legislative employees, exempt from public records requests. Established by the General Assembly in 2016, the Collaboratory relies on direct funding from the legislature to operate.

EU-Approved Pesticide Found to Have Potential Effects on Brain Development

The Guardian reported:

Researchers who re-ran a crucial fungicide study on neurotoxicity have come up with significantly different findings, and campaigners argue that the substance should now be withdrawn from the market.

In 2005, a study conducted by Huntingdon Life Sciences on behalf of ISK, the manufacturer of fluazinam, on the development of neurotoxicity of fluazinam in pregnant rats concluded there were no statistically significant effects in relation to brain development in the rats’ offspring.

In 2008, after a safety evaluation, the pesticide fluazinam was granted approval in the EU. Fluazinam is a Pfas fungicide that is used to control various soil-borne fungal pathogens in potatoes and apples. In 2024, 340 tonnes of it was sold in Germany alone.

The 2005 study, as the Guardian previously revealed, was not submitted as part of the evidence for the approval decision but was used in subsequent discussion.

Share Options

Add to Google
Suggest A Correction
Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form