The Defender Children’s Health Defense News and Views
Close menu
Close menu

You must be a CHD Insider to save this article Sign Up

Already an Insider? Log in

November 17, 2020 Big Tech Legal News

Legal

CHD Files First Amended Complaint in Lawsuit Against Facebook

The amendment details allegations about how Facebook accomplishes its censorship of CHD’s page through its surrogate “fact-checkers,” who are neither “independent” nor objective, and why this agency relationship cannot insulate Facebook from liability under the federal Communications Decency Act, Section 230.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has filed a significant First and Fifth Amendment lawsuit against Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, and two of Facebook’s “fact-checkers” for illegal censorship and “taking” under “color of law,” as well as false promotion/false misrepresentations under federal law (Lanham and RICO Acts).   

On Nov. 13, CHD filed its 150-page First Amended Complaint in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, California. CHD raises detailed factual allegations regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CDC Foundation, and World Health Organization’s extensive relationships and collaborations with Facebook and Zuckerberg, in which Facebook’s joint action in a censorship campaign with the government is but the “tip of the iceberg.” 

CHD also raises detailed allegations about how Facebook accomplishes its censorship of CHD’s page through its surrogate “fact-checkers,” who are neither “independent” nor objective, and why this agency relationship cannot insulate Facebook from liability under the federal Communications Decency Act, Section 230.

 CHD also alleges that Facebook’s misconduct in appointing itself the “arbiter of truth” in order to pervert the very notion of an open scientific debate makes this a perfect vehicle for applying civil law to hold Facebook liable. Facebook claims that it can’t be liable even if it purposely misleads its own users, but that dangerous result cannot be the law.

The court (Honorable Susan Illston) will hear arguments on Facebook’s motion to dismiss on March 19, 2021. Stay tuned!

Learn more by watching this press conference from August after the lawsuit was originally filed:

Suggest A Correction

Share Options

Close menu

Republish Article

Please use the HTML above to republish this article. It is pre-formatted to follow our republication guidelines. Among other things, these require that the article not be edited; that the author’s byline is included; and that The Defender is clearly credited as the original source.

Please visit our full guidelines for more information. By republishing this article, you agree to these terms.

Woman drinking coffee looking at phone

Join hundreds of thousands of subscribers who rely on The Defender for their daily dose of critical analysis and accurate, nonpartisan reporting on Big Pharma, Big Food, Big Chemical, Big Energy, and Big Tech and
their impact on children’s health and the environment.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form